<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ethanol is great! (If you&#8217;re a corn farmer.)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.practicalenvironmentalist.com/alternative-energy/ethanol-is-great-if-youre-a-corn-farmer.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.practicalenvironmentalist.com/alternative-energy/ethanol-is-great-if-youre-a-corn-farmer.htm</link>
	<description>Useful environmentally friendly news and advice.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 08:36:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bob from ALAMN</title>
		<link>http://www.practicalenvironmentalist.com/alternative-energy/ethanol-is-great-if-youre-a-corn-farmer.htm/comment-page-1#comment-2091</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob from ALAMN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.practicalenvironmentalist.com/alternative-energy/ethanol-is-great-if-youre-a-corn-farmer.htm#comment-2091</guid>
		<description>The WSJ got it wrong.

Used without proper context in an article that broadly covers criticism of the ethanol industry, it appears that the American Lung Association is an ethanol critic. This is not true. The American Lung Association recognizes that alternative fuels can play an important role in the reduction of fossil fuel use and that they can vary significantly in their impact on lung health because of their composition and application. 

For example, the American Lung Association of the Upper Midwest has led a nationally-recognized E85 (an ethanol-based alternative fuel that can be used in flex-fuel vehicles) pilot program since 1998. We remain a strong supporter of E85 and biodiesel, both of which have been tested and approved by the Environmental Protection Agency as cleaner-burning alternatives to traditional petroleum fuels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The WSJ got it wrong.</p>
<p>Used without proper context in an article that broadly covers criticism of the ethanol industry, it appears that the American Lung Association is an ethanol critic. This is not true. The American Lung Association recognizes that alternative fuels can play an important role in the reduction of fossil fuel use and that they can vary significantly in their impact on lung health because of their composition and application. </p>
<p>For example, the American Lung Association of the Upper Midwest has led a nationally-recognized E85 (an ethanol-based alternative fuel that can be used in flex-fuel vehicles) pilot program since 1998. We remain a strong supporter of E85 and biodiesel, both of which have been tested and approved by the Environmental Protection Agency as cleaner-burning alternatives to traditional petroleum fuels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
